Monday, May 13, 2024

Update: Bear Defense with Handguns, Third Update. 20 more cases, total of 190 , 98% Effective


Grizzly bear shot in self defense at 10 feet by Jimmy Cox with a 10mm, Sept. 18, 2018, AK

 

The use of handguns as a defense against bears has been shown to be effective 98% of the time. In this study, all cases which can be documented, where a handgun was fired in defense against a bear, are included. This is done by design to guard against selection bias.  All cases cite the source for the case information. Unlike other attempts to put a number on how effective handguns, long guns, or bear spray is in defending against bears, every case is described to readers so they can come to their own conclusions.  Readers may disregard any incidents at their discretion. They may evaluate the cases themselves. One of the keys to a convincing inquiry is the availability of the data used. If a researcher will not show you the data, it is a matter for concern. Research cannot be duplicated unless the base data is understood.

Cases where a handgun was not fired are not included. Access problems for defensive weapons, such as handguns, long guns, bear spray, and edged weapons are very similar.  If the handgun or bear spray is left in a pack, it is much less likely to be used. If the victim is unwilling to practice with their defensive tool so they are reasonably proficient, the result is the same. Extreme accuracy and speed with handguns are seldom necessary. Spray which is not sprayed, or firearms which are not fired, do not reflect on the ability of the device to stop bears.

As the number of documented incidents where pistols were fired as a defense against bears has increased, the entire list became awkward.  This is a link to the last full list of 104 incidents, published on June 21, 2021. One case of the 104 was found to be duplicative and was removed. Included are additional 9 cases where handguns and other lethal instruments were used. They are not included in the handgun statistics. One indeterminate case is recorded in this report, it is a case where both bear spray was sprayed and a handgun fired. It could not be determined if the handgun had an effect.

Here is the link to the first update. The update increased the number of incidents to 123, published on April 11, 2022. 

Here is the link to eleven additional combination cases, bringing the total of handguns and combinations with handguns to 144.

Here is the link to the second update published on November 21, 2023. This update brings to total documented incidents to 145 handgun only incidents, of which three are indeterminate. There are four more combination cases, where handguns and rifles or shotguns are used. The total number of documented bear defense incidents where a handgun was fired increased to 170. 

In this third update in 2024, 19 more handgun only cases are added. One of them is a handgun failure case. The other three handgun failure cases are at this link. The total number of handgun only cases where success or failure is determined, is 162 cases, of which four are failures, for a 98% rate of success. A combination case is included for completeness. The total number of cases is now 190. 

Here are the 20 additional cases in this update, in chronological order.

Early 1960's, Montreal River, Keweenaw County Michigan, black bear, .22 magnum, spring. 

This event happened to James Maierle, a well know educator, principle, and sportsman who lived in Calumet, Michigan. The Montreal river is fairly wild today, and was even more wild in the early 1960s. Keweenaw county is the largest county in Michigan, and it has the lowest population.  The drive from the Montreal River to Calumet would be about a hour more or less. From Jim Maierle, James Maierle's son:

 This was somewhere on the Montreal river up in Keweenaw county where he was stream fishing alone.  I believe it was in the spring.  He said he was walking along the river when he noticed a small cub.  He stopped and looked around and immediately realized he had inadvertently ended up between the cub and the sow.  He started backing away from both of them and the sow started advancing on him.  He put some distance from them but she wouldn’t stop despite him yelling and waving his arms to warn her off.  When he realized she wasn’t backing down he drew the Ruger and waited until it was quite close before he fired.  He was a very good shot so I have no doubt he wanted to make sure he could hit where he was aiming.  The bear went down as I described.  He then took the cub and wrapped it up in his jacket and put it in the trunk of his car.  Not sure what to do with it and not wanting to just leave it to die out there, he brought it to a local bar where some of his friends were to show them (it was the 60s..).  

 2  Spring of 1977, Byers Lake Campground milepost 147 of Parks Highway, Alaska, grizzly bear, .357 magnum.  Alaskan Bear Tales, Larry Kanuit, p. 156. 

Lori Meade was camping with her parents. She and her sister were in a tent and her parents were in a camper. Here father's .357 revolver was in the cab of the pickup. A grizzly bear came into camp, knocked over trash cans and swatted the cooler with about 80 lbs of meat in it. The cooler landed a few feet from the tent. Her father tried to scare the bear off, but it calmly continued to eat from the cooler. Her father then accessed his .357 magnum. From Lori: 

"Dad then got his .357 and fired three rounds into the air. The bear dropped the package of sausage and looked at Dad. He shot another round, and the bear reared."

Dad then started shouting: "Don't say anything! Go out the back of the tent, fast! We have a bear!  

"Being awakened at 5:30 a.m. anytime is a shocker, but with gunfire and a bear in camp!"  

"Well, Lynn couldn't get out of her sleeping bag, so she took it with her - hippity hop, hippity hop. Instead of going out the back of the tent, which Lynn had to crawl under, I went out the front. Off to my right, about three feet, was the bear. Boy, did I ever boogie to the pickup!"

"The bear stood their looking at Dad straight in the eyes, not moving. So Dad had one heck of a decision - He knew he only had one round left.  He was close enough he could kill the bear if he got the bear either between the eyes or in the throat. He wasn't that sure of himself so he started walking toward the bear and shot his last shot in the air. Finally the bear lumbered for the trees. He picked up a steak on his way out!"

 Lori's father only had five rounds in his .357 revolver. 

 

3.  October 19-26, 1986 Churchill, Canada .44 Magnum. From PBHIMS incident 41.  Handgun failure.

 Oct 19-26, 1986, PII,t Churchill. Tourists In temporary camp were observed hand feeding bears for several weeks. Sardines and lard had been put in the willows surrounding camp. During the 6 days researchers were in the camp, 9 bears approached. At the sound of movement within the camp, one bear repeatedly charged the structures and pounded the walls. In the 6 days, 7 charges were initiated by 2 bears. The charges appeared to be directed at the people in the camp. One bear almost entered the stationary vehicles. It was deterred with a broom and bear spray in the face. Fours days later and 4 km SW, a bear with a red stain on its forehead, which may have been the bear spray, charged a group of 12 people. The bear ignored both "cracker shells" and shots from a .44 calibre handgun. The people involved were forced to climb a nearby tower or enter an adjacent building. This is probably the first account of bear spray being non-experimentally used under field conditions on a polar bear.

4.  September 6, 1990, .44 magnum, Desert Eagle, 250 gr. Sierra full profile jacketed silhoette bullets; Wrangle-St. Elias National Park and Preserve, Chitina River, Grizzly bear.

Bruce Brown had successfully harvested a brown bear with a bow. Another bear attacked him, his companion fired a shot from a shotgun, but missed. As the bear mauled him, he was able to draw the his Desert Eagle. From Some Bears Kill p. 145.

In that brief moment, Bruce freed his .44 Magnum pistol from its holster. He clicked off the safety and fired when the bear was at arm's reach, hitting the bear in the front leg. He instantly fired a second shot, hitting the bear in the neck and breaking it. As the animal collapsed to the ground, mortally wounded, Bruce shot it once more for good measure, striking the animal in the shoulder area. The entire attack took less than fifteen seconds.  

5.  1993 August 17, Polar Bear Defense in Canada Coberg Island unknown Caliber 

On August 17, 1993, Stephen Smith had crawled into his sleeping bag a little before midnight, exhausted from a long day of research hanging in a harness, high above ground, banding sea birds. Only 15 minutes later, a polar bear emerged from the sea and was attempting to enter the tent. From Up Here magazine Jan/Feb 2013:

Things were shaking, rumbling, vibrating – a space encapsulated, tumbling uncontrollably, like a car rolling off a highway. A roar beyond the edges closing in; unrelenting confusion; craziness. And then the instant where my stifled scream broke free and the dream was gone. Sitting bolt upright in my sleeping bag, gun in my hand, my world was defined by a domed envelope of yellow nylon.

“BEAR!” I bellowed, grabbing the zipper on the doorway. The stillness of that moment was broken by the ripping of the zipper teeth. The tent door fell away, revealing a very black and moist nose, straddled by two wide and startled eyes. In the space of three pulls on the trigger, two things became certain: A bear had died in the High Arctic, and I was fully awake, bent forward in my sleeping bag.

6. 11 September, 1999, Chichagof Island, Ern Hegglun, Keith Coulter, unknown Pistol, Grizzly Bear p. 177-178, Bear Attacks II Myth & Reality

As close as I can recall, it was about 8:40 a.m. when we went through the trees. Keith shouted, "There's a bear," and he was right. She, (big, tawny, beautiful, and really upset with me) was at the full gallop about 35 meters away, with two cubs close behind. I was in front and knew I was going to wear her, so the only option was to choose the place. That was behind a small tree, on a hummock of moss, with my legs presented to the bear. She took the bait, letting Keith get his handgun out. All I can remember is being bit and being lifted/shook twice on the left leg, the bear going away, coming back, Keith shouting and shooting, and then the bear leaving.

Ern spent a few days in the hospital but recovered from the damage to his left leg. The account implies the sow was not hit, but it is not certain. Ern comments include "a shotgun in a pack is no use at all".  The account was written within nine days of the attack.

 

7. 20 September, 2005 Washington State Bear Attack .45 Long Cold Revolver (black bear)

In 2005, Travis Newman was archery hunting in Washington state. He had drawn an archery elk tag for the Blue Mountains near Walla Walla. Late in the evening of the 20th of September, he was on a familiar elk trail. As he approached a corner, he thought: “I don’t remember seeing that stump before.”  The “stump” was close, about 10 yards.  The “stump” transformed itself into a big bear coming at him full bore, furiously chomping its jaws. Travis thought the bear would bluff, took a step back, and speed drew his Taurus Tracker .45 Colt from a cross-body holster made by Uncle Mike. The revolver was loaded with Remington 250-grain jacketed hollow points.

8. September 28 Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE) Rose Cr, GNF  Table 11 IGBST grizzly bear mortalities 2005.

Human-caused, hunting related, self defense. Bow hunter shot at charging female with pistol. Small amount of blood found. Female was accompanied by 1 yearling.

Human injuries are generally listed in these tables.  

From previous paragraph: 

In addition, we documented 2 possible mortalities during 2005 (Table 11). Both of these instances were hunting related. One involved a conflict at a hunter-killed deer that was left unattended over night. Human injuries were incurred and shots were fired at the bear, but no evidence of wounding of the bear was found. The second possible mortality involved a female with a yearling that was shot at when she charged a bow hunter. This females (sic) was wounded, but evidence at the site indicted the wound was minor. She was observed moving away from the encounter with her yearling.

9.   September 19, 2008  Castle Creek SNF  GYE p. 24 Table 13 Continued IGBST Grizzly mortality table.

This is an incident similar to the one in 2005, which occurred three years later, at a different location, with a different number of bears involved.  Two bears were shot at with a pistol, as described below, in the same incident.

Human-caused, hunting related, female with 2-3 yearlings charged archery hunters calling elk, 1 pistol shot at female at close range, small blood trail for short distance, no carcass found.

Human-caused, hunting related, yearling with mother and 1–2 siblings charged archery hunters calling elk, 2 shots at yearling at close range, small blood trail for short distance, no carcass found. 

10.  March 24, 2013, Svalbard Spitsbergen,hytte at Hornsund, Polar bear

Lyssand said the man and woman in their 40s were staying at the hytte at Hornsund on Svalbard’s island of Spitsbergen when the bear tried to break in through a window. Like most people on Svalbard, they were armed, and the couple told officials that the bear was halfway through the window when one of them inside finally felt compelled to grab their revolver and fire one shot into the eye of the bear, killing it.

Polar bears are a strictly protected species and this one was the first to be shot on Svalbard in nearly two years. Shooting is only allowed in self-defense and the drama on Sunday will be investigated, but Lars Erik Alfheim of the local sheriff’s office told website Aftenposten.no that there were no signs to suggest Sunday’s incident was not a case of self-defense. 

This case was not included in Norway data in the PBHIMS database.

11. September 20, 2020, Wrangell-St. Elias National Park & Preserve, AK,  Pistol defense. 

 Park spokesperson Janice Maslan says the hunters had killed a moose Saturday, and were butchering and packing the meat out to camp Sunday, when they split up.

“The partner returned to camp with a load while Pfeiffer prepared the next load, and when Pfeiffer’s partner returned to within about 50 yards of the harvest site, he was charged by a bear. And in self-defense, he did shoot in the direction of the bear several times with his sidearm, and when the bear came within about 20 feet of him, it did flinch as if shot and it then veered and ran off,” said Maslan.

Maslan says the partner went to the moose kill site and found Pfeiffer dead from what appeared to have been a surprise attack.

“There was no evidence that he was carrying a firearm or deterrence with him at the time, so he was unable to defend himself,” she said.

12. 2022 September 27 Bell Flats Alaska .45 Colt from Taurus Judge three hits, killed by neighbor with shotgun

On Sept. 27, 2022, a massive Kodiak bear made a bad decision to break into Aaron Olsen’s house; he lives just five doors down from Heilman in the small Bells Flats community.

 (snip)

Despite Olsen’s immediate decisiveness, he knew he had to take his shot carefully. He had to shoot around the corner of a bedroom where his two youngest children were sleeping. 

As he pulled the trigger to send a .45 Colt round through the bear’s shoulder, his inner voice reminded him, “Don’t hit the kids.” 

“When I pulled the trigger, I couldn’t see its head. I hope the first shot hit him in the shoulder,” Olsen said. 

Whether from pain or fear, the bear managed to turn its mammoth body around inside the confines of the home’s tiny hallway, likely in an attempt to get back out the way he’d come in. Olsen followed the bear through his house. 

“I was pulling the trigger while shouting ‘Get out of my house!’ along with a lot of logger and fisherman words that I’ve learned over the years,” he said. “There was not an ounce of fear in me in that moment. It was all business. It was just rage, the maddest I have ever been. I could not believe this thing was in my house. I was furious.”

 

13. 2022 October 4, New Castle Colorado  9mm pistol Black Bear

A New Castle resident survived an early Sunday morning bear attack in his backyard, and Colorado Parks and Wildlife officials are searching for the bear, who escaped after the resident shot at it.

The resident heard noises outside around 1 a.m. Sunday and went outside to investigate, and the bear knocked him to the ground, according to a news release from Colorado Parks and Wildlife. As the bear attacked the resident, the man pulled a gun and fired three shots, making the bear run away. The resident was unable to identify whether or not he hit the bear.

 From kktv.com:

“While outside, the victim startled a bear in his backyard, immediately knocking him down to the ground,” part of a news Release from CPW reads. “During the attack, the victim used one arm to protect his face while grabbing his gun with the other free hand, firing three shots and scaring the bear away. The victim was taken to the hospital by a family member with minor injuries to his hand, arm, and chest.”  

Confirmed: a 9mm handgun was used.

14. August 4, 2023 Luther Montana Handgun   (GYE)

When Bolkcom, a commercial painter and elk hunter, went to investigate and tried to coax the Labrador-pit bull mix downstairs, he found a "black bear standing in the living room five feet away," Oblander said.

 Wearing just a T-shirt and underwear, Bolkcom ran back downstairs, got a handgun and returned to the living room where he shot the bear. It ran into the couple's sunroom, so he shot the bear several more times.

(snip)

Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks spokesperson Chrissy Webb said that the warden determined the shooting was justified in self-defense. The large beast had snuck through the couple's screened window and made himself comfortable, the warden concluded.

15.  21 August, 2023 Florida Sanford,  Seminole County Unknown firearm or circumstance black bear   Black bear shot, killed in Sanford, Florida with pistol to protect man and dog. 9mm handgun Glock 43x

The FWC concluded that the man shot the bear to protect his family and his dog. Therefore, no charges or violations were found. Because of that, FOX 35 has decided not to name the man involved.

What happened?

According to the report, the man told FWC detectives that was sitting on his porch with his dog drinking coffee when his bear alarm when off and began flashing. He told detectives he had a pistol with him "due to recent crime in the area," specifically break-ins. 

He got up and looked around the corner to see a bear within 8-10 feet of him, the report said. He yelled at the bear to try and scare it off, and his dog started barking, the report said.

The bear then charged toward him and his dog. "To protect himself and his dog, he fired his pistol at the bear and unloaded a magazine," the report said.

Contact with the Seminole County Sheriff's department revealed the pistol used was a Glock 43X 9mm.

 

16. 25 August, 2023 Massachusetts Black Bear attacked, Goat, threatened Goats owner, Shot at with .38 revolver  Revolver information from Kingston Police PIO via email.

A Massachusetts man shot a black bear after it attacked his goat and appeared like it was going to strike him as well Friday afternoon, according to authorities.

Police received a report of the bear attacking the resident’s livestock, the goat, on Hawthorne Road in Kingston around 3 p.m. Friday, the Kingston Police Department said in a Facebook post. .

 

17. September 6, 2023 Idaho Archery Hunters Grizzly, handguns(GYE)

A large grizzly bear charged at two hunters in thick brush and was shot dead, officials in Idaho said. 

The two were hunting for elk on Sept. 1 when a male grizzly appeared from a close distance and charged at them near Island Park Reservoir, Idaho Fish and Game said. 

They both shot the animal with their handguns, killing it before it injured them, officials said in the Sept. 5 news release

18. Grizzly, Montana, September 8, 2023, pistol fired. Official Montana FWP report (GYE):

BIG SKY – Bear specialists with Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks have concluded a field investigation into a grizzly bear encounter that injured a man south of Big Sky last week.

The attack happened Friday, Sept. 8, in the Yellow Mule area of the Madison Range. During the encounter, one of the victim’s companions fired a pistol at the bear before the bear left. The victim suffered serious injuries from the bear and was flown to a hospital.

FWP staff flew over the area Saturday to look for a bear that may have been wounded. No bears were found during the aerial search, and no collared bears were nearby.

 

19. Black Bear AK, Blake Getty's hunting camp, 17 September, 2023, personal interview, Combination.

 On September 17, 2023, Blake Gettys had been successful in harvesting a moose for meat. This is a common method of getting a supply of meat for the winter in Alaska. The moose meat had been hung on a meat pole at their hunting camp.  The camp is far from other human habitation. To prevent the meat from being stolen, they had hung bells on it. In the middle of the night, Blake and his hunting partner heard the bells. They stepped outside of the cabin. Black had a S&W Airweight .44 Magnum revolver. His partner had a Remington rifle in .338 Magnum.. A black bear was attempting to steal the meat. This is uncommon, but in this part of Alaska, the bear may not have encountered humans before. It was an average black bear, for the area, about 250 lbs. The bear was facing them. Blake fired a warning shot close to the bears front paws. Instead of running off, the bear took a step forward. Blake signaled his partner who shot and killed the bear with his rifle. This was not the first time they had seen this bear in the area. This incident is not counted in the statistics as the use of a handgun in defense against bears because both a handgun and a rifle were used. Black says he could have killed the bear with his .44 Magnum, but chose not to do so when his partner with the rifle was at hand and ready.

 

20. September 30,  2023 Grizzly Bear, handgun North of Henry's Lake, Idaho (GYE)

On the evening of Sept. 30, a hunter shot and killed a large adult female grizzly bear in self-defense after it charged the man while hunting for elk, northwest of Henrys Lake. 

The hunter was moving through heavy timber when the large grizzly came out of the brush a short distance away from him. After yelling to warn his hunting partner of the bear’s presence, the bear charged directly towards him. The hunter was able to draw his sidearm and fire several times, killing the bear only a short distance away, before it was able to make contact. No human injuries have been reported. 

The hunter immediately called the Citizens Against Poaching hotline to report the incident. Idaho Department of Fish and Game responded to the call and conducted a thorough investigation. It was determined that the hunter acted in self-defense during a surprise encounter with the bear from a very close distance. 

This update brings the total to 161 handgun only incidents not counting the three indeterminate cases. There are over a dozen incidents under investigation.  Four failures out of the 161 incidents calculates to a 98% rate of success.  Total cases where a handgun was fired in defense against a bear or bears is 190. Combinations of lethal instruments are not included in the handgun statistics, because it is impossible separate out the effects.

Calibers used vary from .22 LR to .500 S&W Magnum. The most common caliber used has been the .44 Magnum with 46 incidents. One incident with a .44 Magnum is defined as a failure, although no one was injured and the bear does not appear to have been wounded.  The rate of success for the .44 magnum is 98%.  Caliber specific articles are expected to be published in the future.

©2024 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch




TX: Attack Suspect Claims Victim Status, Police Investigate

According to the San Antonio Police Department (SAPD), upon arrival, they were directed to a 55-year-old man who was initially believed to be the victim. He reported that he was approached by a 26-year-old man and another individual, who fired multiple gunshots at him. The 55-year-old man sustained no apparent injuries.

Officers say they located evidence of a crime scene at the location, including spent shell casings. The 26-year-old man and the other individual were arrested a short distance away after being identified by the 55-year-old man.

According to police during the investigation, new evidence came in. It was determined that the 55-year-old man had actually attacked the 26-year-old and another person with a crowbar before the shooting occurred. As a result, the shooting is believed to have been self-defense.

This conclusion was reached after the 55-year-old was initially released under the belief that he was the victim. The firearm used in the incident has been collected as evidence, and both men have been released.

The SAPD is continuing its investigation into this developing case.

More Here

TX: Houston Man Shoots 31-Year-Old who Threatened Him with a Knife

May 10, 2024 - The fatal shooting of a man at 12023 Bissonnet Street about 4:25 a.m. today (May 10) will be referred to a Harris County grand jury.

The identity of the deceased male, 31, is pending verification by the Harris County Institute of Forensic Sciences.  

The male shooter, 67, was not injured in the incident.  

HPD Homicide Division Detectives M. Castillo and K. Hale reported:

HPD patrol officers responded to a shooting call at an apartment complex at the above address and found the male suffering from a gunshot wound. Paramedics pronounced him deceased at the scene.

The first male told investigators the second male was threatening him with a knife and accusing him of stealing from him. Fearing for his life, he shot the second male. The first male attempted to render aid, then called 911 and remained on scene until officers arrived.

The Harris County District Attorney's Office was contacted and it was determined the case would be presented to a Harris County grand jury for review.  

Link Here

Sunday, May 12, 2024

OR: Aggressive Man Shot by Victim

Two private security officers tried convince the man to leave when they say he charged at another man passing by. Authorities say the passerby tried to get away, but the man kept charging at him.

This prompted the passerby to shoot the man, according to police. The security officers then seized the gun and held it for police until they responded to the scene. 

The man who fired the gun was not immediately charged as the firearm was found to be legally possessed and concealed. Authorities say he also remained at the scene and cooperated with officials.


More Here

TX: Houston - Trespass - Confrontation - Shooting; Resident Shoots Intruder

The fatal shooting of a male at 1415 West Gulf Bank Road about 12:30 a.m. today (May 9) will be referred to a Harris County grand jury.  

The identity of the deceased male is pending verification by the Harris County Institute of Forensic Sciences.

The male shooter, 53, was not injured in the incident.

HPD Homicide Division Detectives M. Perez and S. Overstreet reported:

HPD patrol officers responded to a shooting at an apartment complex at the above address and were directed to an unresponsive male near a dumpster across the parking lot from one of the apartment buildings.  Houston Fire Department paramedics responded to the scene and pronounced the male deceased from a gunshot wound(s).

Further investigation determined the tenant was inside his apartment when an unknown male opened the closed apartment door and entered without permission.  The tenant confronted the male, who did not say anything.  When the tenant asked who he was and what he was doing in his apartment, the male walked toward him.  The tenant then physically pushed the male out of his apartment.

Once outside the apartment, the male became physically aggressive and tried to re-enter the apartment a second time.  The tenant, still inside his apartment, feared for his safety, pulled a pistol from his waistband and shot the male at least once.  The male then ran across the parking lot and collapsed in the grass.

The Harris County District Attorney’s Office was contacted and it was determined the case would be presented to a Harris County grand jury for review.


Link Here

Saturday, May 11, 2024

Canada Government Aims to Destroy Browning HiPower pistols


Image courtesey of Rock Island Auction

 

David Pugiliese, reporter on Canadian Forces and military issues, has been following the saga of replacing and destroying the Browning Hi-Power pistols, which have been used by the Canadian military since WWII. Most of the pistols were part of a production run done at the end of the war.  The Canadian military has been working on the project for many years. From David Pugiliese, Ottowa Citizen October 13, 2022:

At this time the Canadian Forces has 11,896 Browning handguns in its inventory, National Defence spokesman Dan Le Bouthillier told this newspaper. Of those, 1,323 are non-functioning.

As the Browning 9mm pistol is currently in use, the details of a disposal plan still have to be worked out, Le Bouthillier explained. “However at this time it is anticipated that given the age and wear of the pistol fleet as well as the fact that the Browning is a restricted firearm and the magazine is a prohibited device, disposal will be through destruction by smelting,” he added.

The magazines of a typical Browning Hi-Power, put into production in 1935, typically hold 13 rounds. They are forbidden in Canada. The highly restrictive Firearms Act of 1995 was passed into law an extreme mass murder in Montreal. A semi-automatic rifle was used to commit the murders. The murder was committed by Gamil Rodrigue Garbi, who changed his name to Marc Lépine because he hated his father.  His father had repeatedly beaten the boy before the family broke up when Gamil was 7. Gamil changed his name to Marc Lépine when he was 13.

Handguns with barrels of less than 105 mm (4 1/8 inches) were banned, as were magazines which held more than 10 rounds. No handgun was used in the mass murder. The barrel length was specifically crafted in the law to ban most handguns. Browning Hi-Powers have a barrel of 4.7 inches, or 119 mm.

On April 24, 2024, David Pugiliese,  Ottowa Citizen, received an email confirming the long held plans:

The Canadian military plans to destroy 11,000 of its Second World War-era pistols by the end of this year.

The move comes as the Canadian Forces confirmed it has received the final deliveries of a new 9-mm pistol as part of a $19.4-million project.

Article content

The military purchased the Sig Sauer P320, which is being distributed to units. It replaces the Browning Hi-Power pistol that has been used by the Canadian Forces for decades.

The Canadian Forces Browning Hi-Power pistols are described, on the net, by Canadian Military veterans as "worn out" "antiquated", heavy, and lacking spare parts. This may be so. But pistols are one of the least fired firearms in any military, given their specialized role. The service life of a Hi-Power should be 30,000 - 50,000 rounds. As these pistols are nearly seventy years old, they would have to have been shot about 500 rounds per year to be worn out.  This is not an unreasonable figure, if ten people were qualified on each pistol each year.  Several veterans said most of the problems they experienced with the pistols were cured when a new magazine was substituted for the old magazine.

There is a market for these historical guns, especially in the United States. It would ordinarily not be too hard for the Canadian government to sell them to an American distributor. However, with the hard commitment of both the Trudeau administration in Canada, and the Biden administration in the United States, to proclaim the ownership of pistols or "weapons of war" by anyone except a government, to be an intrinsic evil, such an eventuality is extremely remote.

The historic pistols will be melted down as a sacrifice to the gods of governmental power.

 

 

 ©2024 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch


 

TX: Burton Gunfight, Homeowner Wounded, Suspects Sought

Deputies arrived at the home responding to a call of a burglary of a vehicle and were met by the homeowner who had been wounded in his lower body. The homeowner told deputies he was alerted to activity in his driveway. When he exited his home, the suspect started shooting at him, hitting him in his lower body.

The homeowner returned fire and the suspect fled to an awaiting pickup truck parked on Rehburg Road.

More Here

PA: Jewelry Store Owner Shoots 1 of several Suspects

The jewelry store owner interrupted the heist as the suspects were already in the store, police said.

The thieves, smashed through several walls and a bathroom on their way to the jewelry store.

Power was cut to at least one business and that may have triggered a response from the store owner, sources said. The jewelry store owner found the suspects at work and struggle ensued during which the shooting took place.

 

More Here

CA: Nguyen v Bonta Stay issued at Ninth Circuit April 24, 2024


On March 11, 2024, Judge William Q. Hayes of the United States District Court, Southern District of California, granted a summary judgement in the case of Nguyen V. Bonta. The case is a challenge to California's one gun a month law. Judge Hayes ruled the law violated the text of the Second Amendment and there were no reasonable analogies in the relevant legal history of the United States.

Judge Hayes granted one month for an appeal to be filed to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The case was sent to a three judge panel of the Ninth Circuit. The administrative panel consists of judges Bennett, R. Nelson, and Miller. All three judges were appointed by President Trump.

On April 24, 2024, the panel granted a stay of Judge Hayes summary judgement to the state of California. Judge Nelson dissented.  Here is Judge Nelson's dissent.  From Nguyen v Bonta Courtlister:

I agree to expedite this appeal. I would deny the stay pending appeal because Defendants are not likely to prevail on the merits. “[W]hen the Second Amendment’s plain text covers an individual’s conduct, the Constitution presumptively protects that conduct.” New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. Bruen, 579 U.S. 1, 17(2022). As the district court properly concluded, the right to buy a firearm is covered by the plain text of the Second Amendment. Moreover, under Bruen, no historical analogue permits California’s regulation. California points mainly to historical regulations of the sale, storage and transport of gun powder—the same analogues California cites to support almost all of its onerous gun restrictions. As the district court properly found, these are not sufficiently close analogues under Bruen. And the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding that the equitable factors do not warrant an injunction where Plaintiffs’ Second Amendment rights are violated. I respectfully dissent.

A different three judge panel will hear the merits of the case. It is not known who will be on the three judge merits panel. The merits panel may or may not extend the stay placed on the case by the administrative panel. The Ninth Circuit has not been friendly to Second Amendment cases. Rulings by three judge panels on the Ninth Circuit, favorable to the Second Amendment as a fundamental right, have all been taken up en banc by the entire court and reversed. As President Trump was able to appoint several judges to the Ninth Circuit, the circuit is not as far left as it used to be. Judge Bumatay went so far as to point out the extreme bias in 2023. From a previous AmmoLand article, Judge Bumatay, dissenting:

 

If the protection of the people’s fundamental rights wasn’t such a serious matter, our court’s attitude toward the Second Amendment would be laughably absurd. For years, this court has shot down every Second Amendment challenge to a state regulation of firearms—effectively granting a blank check for governments to restrict firearms in any way they pleased. We got here by concocting a two-part tiers-of-scrutiny test, which permitted judges to interest-balance away the Second Amendment guarantee. But this approach was “nothing more than a judicial sleight-of-hand, . . .feign[ing] respect to the right to keep and bear arms” but never enforcing its protection. 1087, 1147 (9th Cir. 2021) (en banc) (Bumatay, J., dissenting).

Judge Bumatay's dissent runs for thirty pages. It shows the blatant disregard of a Ninth Circuit majority of judges who wish to impost their policy on the Supreme Court.

Analysis:

This case should be a slam dunk, but at the Ninth Circuit, the Second Amendment is not given as much attention as a bastard child, let alone a fundamental member of the Bill of Rights. The circuits who are defying the Supreme Court are playing a dangerous waiting game. If they can just wait until a conservative justice dies, or a leftist congress packs the court, or President Biden declares martial law.... or something, anything, to remove the possibility of the Second Amendment being given the respect it so legally deserves. Many of the judges on the Ninth Circuit hold the ability to disarm people they disagree with close to their hearts. They are dictators in black robes.


©2024 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch


 


TX: Tenant Shoots Suspect who Pulled Gun

The investigation revealed that the deceased had knocked on the door of an apartment and, after several minutes, the tenant opened the door. The tenant informed the man that he was at the wrong apartment, at which point the man pulled out a gun. Fearing for his own safety and that of a witness, the tenant, who was also armed, fired his weapon multiple times at the man.

More Here

Il: Chicago Woman Shoots Teen Suspect who was Breaking into her Car

CHICAGO (CBS) -- Two teens are facing felony charges after police said a woman shot one of them while they were trying to steal her car Tuesday morning in the South Chicago neighborhood.

Police said around 7:50 a.m. Tuesday, a woman saw a 13-year-old girl and a 14-year-old boy trying to steal her Kia SUV in the 8200 block of South Commercial Avenue.

The woman shot the girl in the right shoulder, and the girl was taken to Comer Children's Hospital, where her condition was stabilized.

 

More Here

Thursday, May 09, 2024

Hans Teeuwen "pistol" was an air gun, as expected by AmmoLand





Link to video of arrival of the police and the original comedy skit.

On March 12, 2024, Dutch absurdist comedian Hans Teeuwen posted a video mocking the mayor of Amsterdam, Femke Halsema.  As part of the video, a vaguely pistol looking object was on a table, at the edge of the screen, next to him.

Three hours later, the police were at his door. The came in and confiscated the object, which was still on the table. AmmoLand covered the story. In the AmmoLand article, this correspondent noted the object was most likely a Webley air pistol.

Image of a Webley air pistol from the author's collection. Notice the rear sight on the object close to Teeuwen. The rear sight is distinctive.

Coverage of the incident continues in the Netherlands. Nos.nl confirms the object was an air pistol. From nos.nl as translated by deepl.com:

Amsterdam police stopped by the home of comedian Hans Teeuwen to take an air pistol. Teeuwen had used the weapon for a persiflage (bantering) film of Amsterdam mayor Femke Halsema. The air pistol, which bears resemblance to a real gun, appears to be a reference to the firearms affair involving her ex-husband Robert Oey and their son.

Air pistols are legal and for sale in the Netherlands.It appears a person has to be 18 years old to purchase one. Replicas of real firearms are much more highly regulated. Some of the air pistols for sale in shops in the Netherlands appear to look more like an actual firearm than the old Webley design.  It may take a court case to determine if the old Webley design too closely resembles an actual firearm to be legal in the Netherlands. Hans Teeuwen indicated he did not expect the case to drag out over a long period. From nos.nl:

According to him, it was an old gun, which he says he doesn't even remember how it works. "So this was a parody of the case about banned gun ownership that was going on around the mayor, and two hours later the police are on the sidewalk. That's incredibly stupid. Especially after Sunday," said Teeuwen, referring to the opening of the Holocaust Museum in Amsterdam, which was partially disrupted by shouting and yelling protesters. Halsema received both criticism and acclaim after that demonstration.

This correspondent is not certain the case will be handled quickly in favor of Teeuwen. Weapons bans tend to become stricter and stricter over time. It seems governments who ban the common ownership of weapons by their subjects often do not like for them to think positively about weapons ownership.  Consider the mindset of government officials who believe the mere ownership of something that looks like a gun should be forbidden, or at least, very highly regulated.

This is not about control of weapons. It is about control of thoughts. Good luck to Hans Teeuwen on his upcoming court case.  Perhaps the judge will throw it out, based on a simple reading of the law.

A message has been sent. Mock the Mayor, and police may show up on your doorstep in a few hours.

©2024 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch

 


MO: Gunfight, Teens and Security Guard

BERKELEY, Mo. – One teen is injured and in custody after a group fired at a QuikTrip security guard early Monday morning, according to police.

Around 5 a.m., a group of teens inside a vehicle shot at a security guard at the Berkeley QuikTrip in the 6800 block of N. Hanley Rd.

The guard was not hit and returned fire, wounding one of the teens in the hand. That teen is now in custody.

More Here

Review: A Device for Refilling Practice Bear Spray (How to)

Image of grizzly bear  by Troy Nemitz, used with permission.

In 2014, John Gookin, Tom Smith, and Alison Williams published a paper in Human-Wildlife Interactions titled:  A Device for Refilling Practice Bear Spray Canisters. The paper shows how to build and use the device.

This correspondent has long maintained bear spray has a valid place as a means of protection against bears. Bear spray does not appear to be as effective in stopping bear attacks as handguns. This does not mean it is not useful. Bear spray can work effectively as a device to haze bears which are merely curious. Bear spray is generally a better deterrent than shouting or arm waving. There are a significant number of places where bear spray can be carried and firearms are forbidden by restrictive government edicts, such as in Canadian national parks. Even in wilderness outside of Canadian national parks, a permit to carry a handgun for defense of self and others is extremely restricted and difficult to obtain. Obtaining permission to possess long guns is not as restricted, but still requires much more paperwork and effort than bear spray. A significant number of people are not comfortable with firearms and are not willing to expend the time and resources to become competent with them.

One of the major disadvantages of bear spray is the expense of practicing with the product.   A simple can of bear spray costs $40 to $60, as checked online.  Inert training cans run about $20. Practice with actual bear spray is not advisable, as inadvertent contact with the spray produces unpleasant results.

About a decade ago, John Gookin invented a device to refill practice cans so that practice could become cheap and easy. He coordinated with graduate student Alison Williams and bear biologist Tom Smith to publish a paper entitled: A Device for refilling practice bear spray. The paper is online. From the paper:

This device for refilling inert bear-spray canisters can be readily built for >$40 with materials from a local hardware store. It will allow users to refill practice canisters hundreds of times, thus, saving money that can be used for other wildlife management needs. Using materials listed here, the device can be constructed in <1 hour. Refilling a spent canister can be done in <1 minute.

It is as necessary to practice with bear spray as with any defensive system. Bear spray, for many reasons, is not as intuitive as using a handgun. With 150 years of cartridge handgun evolution, and literally life and death incentives for improvement, handgun safeties, holsters, grips and sighting systems have been optimized for fast, sure and accurate presentation and use from a holster.

This is not the case with bear spray. More training in accessing spray cannisters, releasing/removing the safety, and aiming the spray, is necessary. Failure to effectively draw, remove the safety, and deploy bear spray can have dire consequences. T.J. Langley was severely mauled in Yellowstone Park, in part because he could not get the safety off.

Caught in the vise of a female grizzly in Yellowstone National Park last month, Langley, of Seattle, assumed he was going to die.

His fingers had found the can of pepper spray held snug in his chest harness, but he couldn't get the safety off before the bear charged.

I congratulate John Gookin for inventing a system to allow economic practice in drawing, removing the safety, aiming, and activating bear spray canisters.  Tom Smith and Alison Williams deserve considerable credit for their part in writing and publishing the paper on how to make and use the device.

©2024 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch

 


 

Wednesday, May 08, 2024

OK: Man Shoots Burglary Suspect

TULSA, Okla. — Tulsa Police said a burglary suspect is in the hospital after being shot at an apartment complex on Monday.

Police said officers responded to a caller who said he’d shot someone he caught stealing at the apartment complex around 3:30 a.m. on Monday. The caller said he grabbed the suspect trying to break into his storage shed and chased him away and that he also saw him checking car door handles.

Police said there was a verbal altercation in the field next to the apartment complex before the caller shot the suspect in the left buttock.

More Here

Tuesday, May 07, 2024

AZ: Prosecutors: No Retrial for Border Rancher, George Allen Kelly (video)

 Kelly Residence, about 150 yards from the border with Mexico, image from Zillow

 

On April 29, 2024, Fox News reported Prosecutors in Santa Cruz County, Arizona, would not re-try border rancher George Allen Kelly.  The Fox report has since been verified. From Fox News. com:

George Alan Kelly, the Arizona rancher charged with murder in the shooting of a Mexican national on his border property, will not be retried, prosecutors with the Santa Cruz County Attorney's office said.

Kelly underwent a lengthy accusation, arrest, and trial process stretching out for nearly a year and a half. At the end, the local jury could not agree on a verdict. This created a mistrial, and the possibility Kelly can be tried again. The eight person jury had one hold out which refused to acquit Kelly. On April 23, the judge declared a mistrial.   From courttv.com:

At about 2:00pm local time the 8-person jury declared they were at an impasse, but the judge asked them to continue deliberating and gave them the option of breaking early for the day.

In Arizona, in criminal cases where the penalty does not exceed thirty years in jail, the size of the jury has been set by the legislature at eight.  From AZleg.gov, size of jury:

A. A jury for trial of a criminal case in which a sentence of death or imprisonment for thirty years or more is authorized by law shall consist of twelve persons, and the concurrence of all shall be necessary to render a verdict.

B. A jury for trial in any court of record of any other criminal case shall consist of eight persons, and the concurrence of all shall be necessary to render a verdict.

Kelly gave an exclusive interview on youtube, explaining his state of mind. From the video:

We still live in the same place. We are still faced with the same threats. The border is still where it is at. The cartel is still active. They know where I live. They got guns. They kill people, all the time, on both sides.

 

 

Analysis:

Because George Allen Kelly had a mistrial and not an acquittal, he faces the potential of a retrial.  The current crop of prosecutors in Santa Cruz County have said they will not re-try him. They cannot bind the actions of future prosecutors. It is entirely possible a future prosecutor, perhaps who was aided in their election by Soros or Cartel money, could re-try George Allen Kelly 10 years from now. There is no statute of limitations on murder. The Kellys have paid a heavy price in punishment by process. They have exhausted their life savings in paying for the defense, in spite of generous help at GiveSendGo.

This case can be laid directly at the feet of the Biden Administration. Since the day President Biden took office, his administration has done everything they can to open the border, suppress border enforcement, and encourage millions of illegal immigrants enter the USA without vetting.  President Biden immediately halted construction of the Trump border wall, which was nearing completion. President Biden retracted the executive orders by President Trump which had been so effective in getting the border under control. The Biden administration paid contractors of the border wall more to stop construction of the wall than it was costing to build the wall.

 

©2024 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch

 




 

TX: Houston Gunfight, Assailant Killed

The fatal shooting of a man at 868 Ringold Street about 10:05 p.m. on Saturday (May 4) is being referred to a Harris County grand jury.

The identity of the deceased man, 58, is pending verification by the Harris County Institute of Forensic Sciences.

The male shooter, 38, was not injured in the incident.

HPD Homicide Division Detectives D. Higgs and B. Stephens reported:

HPD patrol officers responded to a shooting at the above address and found a male unresponsive with multiple gunshot wounds in the driveway of a residence.  Houston Fire Department paramedics responded to the scene and pronounced the male deceased.  Officers then detained a male and several witnesses for questioning.

A preliminary investigation determined an argument ensued between the two males in the driveway of the residence.  One male produced a firearm and discharged several times at the other.  Fearing for his life, the second male retrieved a firearm from his vehicle and returned fire, fatally striking the other male.

The Harris County District Attorney’s Office was contacted and it was determined the case would be referred to a Harris County grand jury for review.

Link Here

Handgun Defense aganst Bears: Caliber not Critical as Thought

 Image by Troy Nemitz, with permission.

 

A continual debate in the firearms and hunting community is controversy over caliber. 9mm v .45.  What is minimum caliber for whitetail deer?  What calibers are good for elk? Moose? Grizzly bears?  In the research of handguns fired in defense against bears, a surprising conclusion springs forth: Caliber is not as important as we thought. Having a firearm is more important than caliber.  There are several reasons why this is so.

First, a firearm builds confidence. A person with a firearms has more confidence they can do something instead of nothing. Call it the psychological factor.   A firearm gives a person the confidence to stand their ground. Even bear spray proponent Tom Smith acknowledges the importance of this. From byu.edu/news, 2008:

Smith believes one of the primary reasons bear spray works is that it gives users a reason to stand their ground. Running is the worst response to an aggressive bear, he said, "but it's hard not to.

Having a firearm gives a psychological lift to a person's confidence. People who are armed walk different, stand different, act different. The confidence labels them as potentially dangerous. This makes bears and other predators hesitate to attack, to assess the human more carefully. Most bears wisely avoid humans. For bears on the edge, this can make a difference.

Second, there is noise. Firearms, even small caliber handguns, are loud, much louder than nearly anything in nature except for a thunderclap. Warning shots work primarily though noise.  Warning shots are seriously underrated, because most successful warning shots are not reported. Of the documented incidents where handguns were fired in defense against bears, warning shots worked 21 of  29 times, or 69%.  Bears which are indifferent to the presence of a human and to warning shots are very dangerous bears.  Warning shots help to reveal a bear's attitude. Reports from the Svalbard Archipelago show they have very good success in deterring polar bears with warning shots. From kho.unis.no:

If the bear is already moving toward you, aim to one side or above its head to avoid hitting it accidentally. Continue shooting rifle shots or flares until it retreats. In nearly all cases this will be sufficient to scare curious or even aggressive bears away.

An advantage of handguns over most rifles is handguns have a greater magazine capacity, allowing for more warning shots while keeping enough rounds in reserve for defensive purposes. Most handguns are designed to be reloaded more rapidly than most rifles.

Tom Smith, who loves bears, acknowledges the viability of noise as a defense, as well. From Efficacy of Bear Deterrent Spray in Alaska:

On 10 occasions (14%, 10 of 71) the sight and sound associated with spray release were reported as key factors in changing bear behavior.

Third, there is pain. The theory of bear spray is to deliver pain to the bear, causing it to stop its attack. Even small caliber handguns deliver intense pain. One hit from a small caliber handgun to the body is likely to deliver more pain and damage than a paw strike or bite from another bear. A single shot delivered from a small caliber handgun, if it enters the thoracic cavity or abdominal cavity, will likely kill the bear over time.  Bears are not impervious to pain. Enough pain and/or damage will cause them to break off the attack. Of 130 incidents in our documented cases where it could be determined a hit was made, bears were driven off before they were killed in 113 cases, or 87% of the time.  Many of those hits were from powerful firearms, but the principle is pain works. Only 13 of the 151 recorded successful uses of firearms (including some combination cases) where sufficient information was available, were fast central nervous system hits which stopped the attack nearly instantaneously. Other mechanisms stopped the attack in over 91% of the cases. In research to determine deterrent effect, rocks/slingshots or rubber slugs were more effective than bear spray in motivating a black bear to leave. It is difficult  to believe hits from small caliber handguns would be less effective than slingshots or rubber slugs.

These three mechanisms explain how caliber is less important than commonly thought. They explain how magazine or cylinder capacity may be more important than thought. Confidence, noise, and pain may be greater with more powerful handguns, much of the time. However, a person who is well practiced and capable with a 9mm may be more confident and effective than a person who has not practiced and is afraid of the recoil of a .500 S&W Magnum. Smaller calibers often have greater capacity for warning shots.  A .22 magnum with a 2 inch barrel may be louder than a .38 special with a six inch barrel.

Raw power is not the only consideration. A .22 you have is better than a shotgun where you cannot access it. A major advantage of handguns is they and their carry systems have undergone a hundred and fifty years of evolution and refinement. They have been refined, with many decades of real life and death experience, with the purpose of fast and accurate access, presentation, and delivery of fire.

Caliber, or power, can be important. It is not as important as once thought.

 

©2024 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch


Sunday, May 05, 2024

NC: Ongoing Investigation, Man Killed by Property Owner

CARTHAGE, N.C. (WNCN) — One person was shot and killed Saturday night after trespassing in Carthage, according to the Moore County Sheriff’s Office.

On Friday at 8:15 p.m., deputies were dispatched to a report of a trespassing at a private residence along Dowd Road in Carthage.

After arriving, deputies found a man deceased from an apparent gunshot wound following an encounter with the property owner.

More Here

TN: Man Shot in Knee had Assauted Son, Neighbor

Investigators now say the shooting Thursday evening on Vulcan Lane in Harrison was a case of self-defense.

And the “victim” has now been charged, himself.

Hamilton County investigators said that Gregory Burnett had actually assaulted his son and a neighbor.


More Here

FL: Orange City Victim Shot, Wounded, Returns Fire


Deputies said Wilson was outside when his neighbor was headed to the gym before work.

A witness reported hearing Wilson twice yell, “Get back inside your house or you’re dead,” according to deputies, who added that the victim responded, “Are you talking to me?”

Wilson told his neighbor that he was going to count down from three, and if the victim didn’t return inside, he’d shoot, the sheriff’s office said.

Wilson quickly counted down from and fired his shotgun, according to deputies, who said the victim fired a handgun several times at Wilson after he was shot.

Wilson was not struck and went back into his home, sheriff’s officials said.

Deputies said they recovered both firearms and other evidence.

 

More Here


Saturday, May 04, 2024

NICS March 2024: Gun Sales and Background Checks are slowly Dropping


U.S.A. --(AmmoLand.com)--- The National Instant background Check System (NICS) numbers for March of 2024 are significantly lower than March of 2023. Gun sales for March of this year, at 1.39 million, are 92% of last year, at 1.51 million. They are the lowest sales for March back to 2019. While this shows a drop in sales since the extraordinary sales levels in the election year of 2020, it is a relatively high number.

The NICS check numbers are even lower.  They are the lowest recorded for March since 2017. There is only a mild link between NICS checks and firearms sales, because NICS checks are used for many things as well as firearms sales.

Individual states such as Kentucky and Illinois have systems which do NICS checks on hundreds of thousands of people every month. The NICS checks for firearm permits and permit rechecks were over a million for March of 2024. They are highly variable by state. The trend to Constitutional, or permitless carry, has slowed the number of applications for carry permits, though they are extremely popular. The number of permits in 2023 is about the same as in 2022, about 20 million permits in the USA. This could change dramatically if the US Supreme Court slaps down the defiance in states such as New York, Maryland, California, and New Jersey In eight highly restrictive states, the legislatures continue to add difficulties to carry permit applications. The potential number of people desiring permits in the those highly restrictive states is, conservatively, another 4-8 million people.

Firearm and accessory prices appear to be dropping with the drop in sales, in direct contradiction to monetary inflation.  The bogging down of the economy is likely having an effect, as people cut back on elective purchases and individual debt is piling up. If the choice is food, gas, or another AR15 and a case of ammunition, food and gas will usually get the nod.

Continueing with the long term trend, handguns are the most popular firearms in NICS with about 56% of the sales.  Long guns are about 33% of the sales. Checks for other and multiple sales make up the remaining 11%.

 

 

 


 

The conventional wisdom is a presidential race with Donald Trump as one of the candidates would be a large boost to firearm sales. This year, much will depend on whether former President Trump is able to take the nomination (which seems likely), or is placed in serious legal jeopardy (depending on the success of the Democratic party lawfare), or if President Biden hangs on long enough to secure the Democratic Party nomination.  All those outcomes appear cloudy in this correspondent's crystal ball.  The Biden Administration's war on firearm sales, the gun culture, and the Second Amendment will add a bit to firearm sales. The people who are aware of these atrocities may already have their firearms and ammunition wants/needs satisfied.

The election season is a good time to take a friend to the range, or to help a person register to vote.

 

©2024 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch


 


 




TX: San Antonio, Man Shoots Alien who Threatened Him

Police said an undocumented couple were arguing inside an apartment when a neighbor, identified as William Oliver, 49, told them to calm down. The 21-year-old man allegedly put a gun to Oliver's head and, while speaking Spanish, threatened to kill him. Oliver then walked backed to his apartment

Oliver told police that he thought the other man was trying to kick in his front door. That's when he grabbed a shotgun, loaded it with bird shot, and shot the suspect in the hand and foot. A female bystander was also hit in the leg.

Both the victim and bystander were taken to the hospital in stable condition.

So far, Oliver is facing no charges.


More Here

Friday, May 03, 2024

TN: Governor Bill Lees Signs Modest School Reform Bill to Allow Highly Regulated Staff to Protect Children

Tennessee Capitol

On Friday, April 26, 2024, Governor Bill Lee signed the popular school reform bill which would allow a few, voluntary, highly regulated school staff to carry concealed firearms to protect the children under their care. The reform bill moves Tennessee from the few states which completely ban school staff from carrying concealed firearms to those states which allow staff to protect their children, but with extreme restrictions. A majority of states have programs which are much less restrictive than the bill signed by Governor Lee.

The bill, SB1325/HB1202 was popular in the state legislature, where it was passed with veto proof majorities.  The bill is much more restrictive than the requirements for ordinary police officers firearms training. Initially, volunteers who wish to protect the children in their care most complete 40 hours of firearms training, as much as ordinary police officers. Current or former police officers who are school staff are exempt from this initial training.

An additional 40 hours of training must be completed every year by each volunteer. The training has to be paid for by the volunteer ( or their school). Police departments are not required to provide the training for free.  Most police officers do not receive an additional 40 hours of firearms annual training. Most have between 1-8 hours of qualification hours a year, which is testing, not training.

The staff volunteers who wish to be able to protect the children in their care must willing to take a week of time off to train each year (or, perhaps five days of week-ends), and to pay for the training out of their own pocket, every year, at a local police department. From the bill, as signed by Governor Bill Lee:

(D) Have successfully completed forty (40) hours in basic training in school policing as required by § 49-6-4217 when the authorization to carry a handgun on school grounds is issued. The faculty or staff member must complete a minimum of forty (40) hours of training specific to school policing that has been approved by the peace officer standards and training (POST) commission each year to retain the authorization. Any such training must be approved by the LEA and the cost of the training, firearm, and ammunition is at the expense of the person seeking authorization to possess and carry a concealed handgun on school grounds, not the LEA of the school at which the person is assigned;

Effectively, only those schools who are willing to pay to have staff attend an annual 40 hours of training ( which will likely include travel expenses) will have armed staff under this bill. This requirement makes Tennessee one of the most restrictive states in the nation, other than those which completely ban staff from carrying concealed weapons to defend the children in their care.

Even this mild and modest reform bill was adamantly opposed by those who desire an unarmed population. Their major argument was "Guns are Bad".  From a student activist group in the Tennesseean:

We have elected these legislators to serve us, and yet nothing we have done has made them listen. We students are educated, we are intelligent, and we are opposed to the existence of guns in schools. We refuse to be political bargaining chips to serve misguided purposes.

Analysis:

It is unlikely primary and secondary school students are old enough to have voted in the last election.  Who has impressed upon this small group of activist students the idea "Guns are Bad"? Why should minors, with little experience, who are notoriously gullible and malleable, be given any credence in a public debate about policy matters? This correspondent explained the mindset in a previous essay.

This bill is a very small and minor step on the way to allowing effective protection of students in primary and secondary schools in Tennessee.

 

©2024 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch

 

 



SC: Burglary Suspects Shoot at Armed Homeowner

Police told WYFF News 4 an Alexa device notified a victim that his garage camera had been activated. The homeowner grabbed his gun and saw three people walking away after coming out the front door, according to Mauldin Police.

He yelled at the three people and they took off running. While they ran, one of the suspects started shooting at the homeowner, officers said.

At least one bullet hit the house. The homeowner was not hit and did not shoot back at the suspects, according to police.

More Here

MS: Woman Returns Home. Burglary Suspects Shoot at Her. She Returns Fire

The woman said her daughter was not home at the time of the incident and that the suspects broke into the home.

According to the woman, her daughter returned home, and the suspects fired shots at her. The daughter fired shots at the suspects. She was not injured.

Jackson police said the three suspects fled the scene, and one of them was later captured.

More Here

Thursday, May 02, 2024

What Happened to Florida Defense Against Bears, HB 0087?

Image from Winter Springs, Florida, Police Department

 

On March 8, 2024, the Florida legislature overwhelmingly voted for the HB0087: Taking of Bears. The Bill restores the ability of people in Florida to protect themselves, their pets, and dwellings from Florida black bears, which was administratively taken from them in 2012. The population of Florida black bears has skyrocketed, along with complaints and damage done by bears, particularly in Northern Florida.

Florida legislative procedures require the governor to sign bills (after the legislature adjourns) withing 15 days or they become law without his signature. The timing starts when the governor receives the bill from the legislature.  Executive approval:

SECTION 8. Executive approval and veto.

(a) Every bill passed by the legislature shall be presented to the governor for approval and shall become a law if the governor approves and signs it, or fails to veto it within seven consecutive days after presentation. If during that period or on the seventh day the legislature adjourns sine die or takes a recess of more than thirty days, the governor shall have fifteen consecutive days from the date of presentation to act on the bill.

Some time is required for bills to be signed by officers of the legislature, then sent to the governor. Florida Presentation to the Governor:

Each bill and joint resolution passed in both houses shall be signed by the presiding officers of the respective houses and by the secretary of the senate and the clerk of the house of representatives during the session or as soon as practicable after its adjournment sine die.

It has been nearly a month since HB0087 passed the Florida legislature with overwhelming votes in both chambers. According to  legiscan, it has not been signed by legislative officers or sent to Governor DeSantis. If correct, the clock for Governor DeSantis to sign the bill has not been started. Around Osceola.com has commented on the situation. From aroundosceola.com:

Senate spokeswoman Katie Betta said Senate President Kathleen Passidomo, R-Naples, “Has signed all of the bills and directed the secretary to transmit them at the request of the governor.”

Most bills will be signed without causing a stir. But a handful are more controversial after getting approval from the Republican-controlled Legislature. For example:

The Sierra Club, the Center for Biological Diversity and the South Florida Wildlands Association are among groups seeking a veto of a bill (HB 87) that would allow people to kill bears when they reasonably believe it is necessary to avoid a threat of death or serious injury. The bill stems from complaints about bears posing a threat to residents in rural areas of Northwest Florida.

Has the legislature given the authority of the timing of when the bills are sent to the governor, to the governor?

directed the secretary to transmit them at the request of the governor.”

The Sierra Club, the Center for Biological Diversity and the South Florida Wildlands association can muster thousands of members to phone and sign petitions. They are known for their emotional appeals. Such groups portray bears as innocent creatures which never harm anyone or anything. Most of their members do not have to live with bears, have no personal experience with bears, and do not question the way bears are portrayed by those who rake in millions of dollars in sympathy donations.  The fact that most bears are killed by other bears is carefully hidden from them. About half of all bear cubs killed every year are killed by adult male bears. Most bears killed in a year are cubs. Most bears causing problems are males.

Removing the few bears causing problems in the state will greatly reduce the damage done by bears. The number of problem bears taken by people at risk will probably be less than 30.  The number of bears illegally taken in Florida is tiny, according to Florida Fish Wildlive Commission. The FWC numbers do not include cubs killed by other bears.

Analysis: HB0087 is at risk. If it had been sent to Governor DeSantis, it would already have become law, been signed, or been vetoed. Instead, it sits in limbo while radical deep green environmentalists  gin up emotional demands for Governor DeSantis to veto the bill.

Governor DeSantis has stood up to the woke fascists and worked hard to make sure the vote is safe and legitimate in Florida. Will he be willing to stand up to the deep green environmentalists?

 

©2024 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch



 

 

 



FL: Disarm. Robbery Victim grabs gun, opens fire. Onlooker Blocks Escape Route

The incident happened just before 2 a.m. Sunday outside Wynwood Brick House at 178 Northwest 28th Street.

According to the reports, a man was leaving the club and as he approached his car he was confronted by the three armed suspects.

"You know what it is!" one of the suspects said, as they pointed their weapons at him and demanded his money and jewelry, the reports said.

The man handed over his chain, then grabbed a gun from one of the suspects and exchanged gunfire with the other two, the reports said.

A second victim witnessed the robbery and yelled at the suspects, and one of the ski-masked suspects who was armed with an assault rifle started shooting at him, the reports said.

The suspects tried to flee the scene but the second victim used his vehicle to block the exit, so they started ramming his vehicle, then  tried to run from the scene, the reports said.

More Here

Wednesday, May 01, 2024

Oral argument scheduled for May 1 on Texas Silencer Case, New Orleans, West Courtroom


A firm date and time for the oral arguments in the Texas silencer case, Paxton v. Dettlebach has been set.

A Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals three judge panel will be hearing oral arguments on May 1, 2024, at 9:00 a.m. in New Orleans, 600 Camp Street. Seating for the public will be limited.

The three judge panel consists of Judge Edith H. Jones, appointed by Ronald Reagan in 1985, Judge Edith Brown Clement, appointed by H.W. Bush in 1991, and Judge Cory T. Wilson, appointed by Donald J. Trump in 2020. From the case records:

The above referenced case has been scheduled for oral argument on 05/01/2024. It will be held in New Orleans -West Courtroom at 9:00. The Oral Argument session number is 41.


 

The West Courtroom is on the second floor, room 265. Here are court instructions for attending oral arguments. Attending Oral Arguments:

The courthouse doors open at 8:00 a.m. on argument days. Visitors must show photo identification and pass through security screening. Attorneys and their staff may bring electronic devices into the courthouse. All electronic devices must be turned off in the courtroom unless being used by counsel, with all sounds muted, during argument of their case to retrieve documents previously downloaded to the device. A wireless Internet access point is available in the library for use with personal electronic devices (Room 106 – see librarian for password).


Fifth Circuit Rule 34.7 provides that no cameras, tape recorders, or other equipment designed for the recording or transmission of visual images or sound may be present during oral argument.  All visitors attending oral arguments must turn off cell phones, laptop computers, and similar electronic devices when in the courtroom. You may not blog, tweet, or otherwise transmit contemporaneous or live transcription or observations from the courtroom.


Food and beverages may not be brought into the courtrooms.

(snip)

Public seating in the courtrooms is on a first-come, first-seated basis, and the amount of gallery seating in each courtroom varies widely.

Recording of the Oral Arguments is not allowed in the Fifth Circuit. A Live link to the arguments is available. It is only available while the arguments are proceeding.  A recording of the Oral Arguments is released by the court after 5:00 p.m. the day of the arguments.

As mentioned in the previous AmmoLand article, the arguments before the three judge panel are whether the State of Texas, represented by AG Ken Paxton, has standing in this case, or if any of the three individual Texas residents, who wish to make their own silencers, without paying the federal $200 tax or placing federally mandated serial numbers on them, have standing.

The District Court ruled the plaintiffs did not have standing. It is a major step forward for the standing arguments to be heard by a three judge panel of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

From the map, easy parking does not appear to be close to the courthouse. If I were in New Orleans, I would attend the oral arguments in person. 20 minutes of arguments are allocated to each side.  Watching the attorneys and the judges can sometimes give hints as to how they may rule. Listening to the livestream is the next best thing to being there.

 

©2024 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch